Revisiting
Convention Decisions Two Years Later
By
Jon Coyne
Many things were accomplished at the 2004 Convention of
The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. Two years later it is
important to consider the impact of several decisions as we
anticipate and prepare for the 2007 Convention.
Resolutions
7-02a and 7-14
7-02a amended the Articles of Incorporation and the
Bylaws of the LCMS, eliminating any confusion about the fact
that in the LCMS certain limits are placed on Synod’s Board
of Directors. Specifically, the BOD is not charged or elected
to supervise theology. This responsibility rests with the
Synod’s President and other elected officers.
Some have charged that 7-02a took away the power
accorded Synod’s Board of Directors by the laws of the state
of
Missouri
. A careful reading of Missouri Law, Chapter 355.096-3-3b,
proves otherwise: “The articles of incorporation may set
forth: (3) Provisions not inconsistent with law regarding: (b)
Defining, limiting, and regulating the powers of the
corporation, its board of directors, and members, or any class
of members.” In other words, the Synod in Convention is free
to make such amendments.
7-14 similarly changed how vacancies are filled on the
Board of Directors and other boards.
Resolution
8-01a
8-01a changed the system for expelling from the LCMS
congregations and called workers. Previously, any person (non-LCMS
members, non-Lutherans, and even non-Christians) could bring
charges. Now only congregations and individual members of the
LCMS may bring charges.
Furthermore, 8-01a goes on to say that Matthew 18 must
be followed in order for the complaint to move forward. In
other words, the initial goal must be reconciliation rather
than expulsion.
Have lay people “lost the ability to judge their
pastor,” as some claim is the result of 8-01a? No. They
still have the ability to bring charges to the appropriate
supervisors, if the steps outlined in Matthew 18 are followed.
A very positive result of 8-01a is that fewer frivolous
complaints are being made against pastors and other called
workers. Instead, District Presidents have more time to spend
on situations warranting attention.